What is a Quasi Experimental Design1

What is a Quasi-Experimental Design?

SHARE THE ARTICLE ON

Table of Contents

What is a Quasi-Experimental Design?

What is a Quasi Experimental Design2

In experimental research, units are assigned to an experimental group and to a treatment group. The treatment group, also known as the experimental group, receives the treatment being studied by the researcher. The control group, on the other hand, receives a placebo or no treatment at all. In a true experiment, units of the sample group are assigned to either group using random assignment. However, there are some studies that do not employ the use of random assignment. These studies follow a quasi-experimental research design. 

The quasi-experimental design, just like a true experiment, aims to identify the cause-and-effect relationship between two variables; the independent and dependent variable. The only difference is that the quasi-experimental design employs non-random criteria while assigning subjects to groups. 

See Voxco survey software in action with a Free demo.

See Voxco survey software in action with a Free demo.

Types of Quasi-Experimental Designs

Let’s explore the most common types of quasi-experimental designs:

  • Regression Discontinuity

The regression discontinuity approach involves measuring the impact of the treatment, or independent variable, by applying a treatment assignment mechanism that is based on a continuous eligibility index that is variable with a continuous distribution.

Subjects are therefore selected to be a part of the treatment group based on whether their value on a predetermined numeric rating scale exceeds a designated threshold. Those who fall below that threshold, do not receive the treatment and will hence be part of the control group instead. 

  • Non-equivalent Groups Design

In the non-equivalent groups design, researchers select two groups; one is exposed to the treatment while the other is not. This is not considered random assignment as the researcher is working with pre-existing groups and not allocating subjects to either group based on random assignment. Although researchers aim to select two groups that are as similar as possible, we can never be sure that the groups are actually comparable. It is highly unlikely that the two groups would be as comparable as they would have been if they were created using random assignment. This design was named as the nonequivalent groups design for this very reason, as it’s likely that the two groups are not equivalent. 

  • Natural Experiments

In both laboratory and field experiments, researchers generally determine how subjects are assigned to groups, whether that be through random or non-random criteria. However, in natural experiments, a naturally occurring external event or situation results in the random assignment of subjects to different groups. Therefore the factors that influence assignment are out of the control of investigators.

Although many natural experiments employ a method that resembles random assignment, they are still not considered to be true experiments because they utilize the observational method. Some situations in which natural experiments are appropriate and commonly used include policy changes, weather events, and natural disasters. 

Application of the Quasi-Experimental Design

Quasi-experimental studies have lower internal validity than true experiments and also cannot establish a causal relationship between variables as effectively. So why do researchers use it? 

There are certain situations where the use of a quasi-experimental design is more suited to the study. This is especially true for studies where it would be unethical to withhold treatment from a subject based on a random basis. In such situations, a quasi-experimental design can be utilized to avoid any ethical issues.

Additionally, another context in which a quasi-experimental design is more appropriate is when the true experiment design is not feasible. This could be due to the high expenses associated with true experiments. It could also be due to the fact that true experiments generally involve a lot of work to effectively design an experimental intervention for the threshold of subjects required to justify the research as a true experiment.

Customer experience

Advantages of the Quasi-Experimental Design

The following are a few advantages of utilizing a quasi-experimental research design:

  • Less Expensive: One of the most prominent advantages of quasi-experimental studies is that they are less expensive and require relatively fewer resources than randomized controlled trials. 
  • Higher External Validity: Relative to true experiments, quasi-experimental studies tend to have higher external validity as they often involve real-world interventions rather than artificial laboratory settings. This makes it more likely to reflect real-world situations and settings. 

Disadvantages of the Quasi-Experimental Design

The following are a few disadvantages of utilizing a quasi-experimental research design:

  • Risk of Confounding Bias: Lack of randomization makes it harder, or even impossible in some cases, to rule out confounding variables and their influence on the causal relationship being studied. 
  • Low Internal Validity: Compared to true experiments, quasi-experimental studies have lower internal validity and therefore aren’t as effective in establishing causality. 

Explore all the survey question types possible on Voxco

Explore all the survey question types possible on Voxco

FAQs on Quasi-Experimental Design

The quasi-experimental design, similar to true experiments, is a research design that aims to identify the causal relationship between an independent and dependent variable. However, unlike true experiments, quasi-experimental studies utilize non-random criteria while assigning subjects to groups.

Some common types of quasi-experimental designs are regression discontinuity, nonequivalent groups design, and natural experiments.

Some advantages of quasi-experimental studies are that, when compared to true experiments, they are less expensive and have higher external validity.

Read more

Pulse Survey1

Pulse Survey

Pulse Survey Voxco is trusted by 450+ Global Brands in 40+ countries See what question types are possible with a sample survey! Try a Sample

Read More »